<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Difference Between InnoDB and MyISAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/</link>
	<description>programming.........</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>My experience with MyISAM and InnoDB, is that MyISAM is optimal for big nasty logs and/or if you need to do a relevancy-relied full text search (as another author stated, with the help of MATCH and AGAINST). This compared to InnoDB that is optimal when it comes to handling and storing integers, using transaction-critical applications, etc.

Oh, and a protip to all developers: when logging things, make it log things efficient; don&#039;t make the table bigger than it needs to be. Start by using INET_ATON to store IP-adresses as 32-bit integers instead of 16 digit char. Always mind the scale of volumes for those poor DBA&#039;s sake ;-)
Also, check out the facebook-patch for InnoDB - they&#039;ve really made some cool optimizations worth checking out.

cheers
/Joey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with MyISAM and InnoDB, is that MyISAM is optimal for big nasty logs and/or if you need to do a relevancy-relied full text search (as another author stated, with the help of MATCH and AGAINST). This compared to InnoDB that is optimal when it comes to handling and storing integers, using transaction-critical applications, etc.</p>
<p>Oh, and a protip to all developers: when logging things, make it log things efficient; don&#8217;t make the table bigger than it needs to be. Start by using INET_ATON to store IP-adresses as 32-bit integers instead of 16 digit char. Always mind the scale of volumes for those poor DBA&#8217;s sake <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Also, check out the facebook-patch for InnoDB &#8211; they&#8217;ve really made some cool optimizations worth checking out.</p>
<p>cheers<br />
/Joey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitthykun</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitthykun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>can you tell me, what size of the maximum storage of MySQL?
both innodb and myisam.

cheer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you tell me, what size of the maximum storage of MySQL?<br />
both innodb and myisam.</p>
<p>cheer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Mihok</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Mihok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>MyISAM databases support the MATCH and AGAINST keywords for searching, very useful for that purpose, but the InnoDB offers better speed and space consumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MyISAM databases support the MATCH and AGAINST keywords for searching, very useful for that purpose, but the InnoDB offers better speed and space consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Difference Between InnoDB and MyISAM &#124; Vadim Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Difference Between InnoDB and MyISAM &#124; Vadim Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] reading Tapos Blog post about the differences between InnoDB and MyISAM database engines i found out that InnoDB does not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading Tapos Blog post about the differences between InnoDB and MyISAM database engines i found out that InnoDB does not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senthil</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>senthil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Since we have higher performance with added features in Innodb than myISAM .why should we have it seperated ? rather than giving Innodb as updated version of myISAM . Any how people going to use Innodb only. why does myISAM still exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we have higher performance with added features in Innodb than myISAM .why should we have it seperated ? rather than giving Innodb as updated version of myISAM . Any how people going to use Innodb only. why does myISAM still exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sripathi</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>sripathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>i need more information about those structures and transactions, like which best for tractions.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need more information about those structures and transactions, like which best for tractions&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: totally bingo</title>
		<link>http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>totally bingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapos.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/difference-between-innodb-and-myisam/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;totally bingo&lt;/strong&gt;

totally bingo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>totally bingo</strong></p>
<p>totally bingo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
